🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that indecision over how to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Officials maintain it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least a portion of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, along with its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in bereaved families feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that process with residents.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to find the right answers for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the physical loss of sacred ground.